Thursday, February 3, 2011

Rejection I Can Take

So, I mentioned in an earlier post some bitterness over having been interviewed and then left to realize that silence means "no".

Today, I got told "no" by Canadian Tire and they didn't even interview me. This is the difference between a company I will consider applying to again and one that I won't bother to think about again.

We would like to thank you once again for your recent resume exploring the employment opportunity of <redacted> with Canadian Tire.
We have carefully assessed your qualifications in light of the requirements of the position. While your experience and qualifications were certainly of interest, we are currently pursuing other candidates whose background more closely meets our immediate needs.
While we will not be proceeding further with your resume for this position, please be assured that your profile will be confidentially maintained, in our database, for consideration as other appropriate positions become available. We also invite you to visit our website regularly and apply on-line to other opportunities that may be of interest to you.
We thank you for your interest in Canadian Tire and wish you success in your future endeavours.
Now I wasn't born yesterday. I know that this is an entirely automated process and that they likely didn't even glance at my resume. The greater likelihood is that my answers to their pre-screening questions on their recruitment website didn't match their search criteria and I got thrown onto a mass mail rejection letter list. Nonetheless, they are capitalizing on the use of technology to not piss anyone off and at least give the impression of caring.

Thank you, Canadian Tire. It relieves me to know that I can walk the aisles of your store and know that I am (sorta) loved.

Interview Preparation

I have the telephone interview in a few hours so I am doing a little preparation. The company kindly forwarded me a link to their company website (yep, found typos) and it was nice.

Google, however, is your friend. Google took me to a YouTube video.

An American news show did a cover story on this company's main facility and all I can say is "Whoa".  The website was pretty standard and uninspiring (in text, this could be perceived as a rather staid, dull business and it had a dead president on it's front page) but the television broadcast made it sound a lot more attractive because this organization is/has been involved in some very historic activities.

It also showed that the company isn't filled with suits which is appealing to me. I have an aversion to the overabundance of  "suits". And the suits that are there are bad ones. Like off the rack, not tailored. This is a good sign. Low narcissism quotient here.

So, let's see. Pros and Cons.

Pro: History, I like history.
The Con: It's old. Old often means, well, old. Old values, old approaches.

Pro: Website is professional.
The Con: Website is boring. However, the modifier here is that their business deals with a boring activity unless you are an archivist or a librarian. I could be swayed here.

Pro: Big, important customers. The company is not going to close shop soon as long as the contracts stay signed.
The Con: Government is the biggest customer. And we all know how that works. Hurry up and wait.

Pro: It's a big Canadian job in a big U.S. company.
Con: See above. No offense to American readers, but it is sometimes really frustrating to try to represent what is largely considered to be America's attic in a big organization.

Okay, well, so here's where we stand. I am wary, somewhat interested, but willing to play.

Dealbreakers? Any mentions of a journey, tradition, the term on-boarding, excessive use of business speak (B.S.) and anything that requires me to sing.

Snow Days and Interviews

Mounds and mounds and mounds of snow.


(source: http://www.thestar.com)

Spent a large part of yesterday shovelling much like most people who live in the east(ish). Fortunately the snow did not deter one stalwart interviewer. No ho, because she called me. Yes! Me. On her cell phone. From home. Well, because of the snow.

Scoooooore!

So, yeah, it's not the night job and I admit to being a bit bummed about that but it is the job that I have done before (and the one that pays the most). It's all good.

Telephone Interview. At least I can still have garlic.

(Did anyone else notice that the guy in the video manages his snow blower like a zamboni driver? and he left a strip in the middle)

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Night Jobs

Happy Day! There are three possibles in my alerts today. One that is exactly a role I have done in the past, one is something that I have done, wasn't overzealous about but will handle and one...is a night job.

Strangely enough, it is the night job that appeals to me. Why? Well, I am not busy most nights anyway but the night job is a not a full 40 hour week (only 25) and the best part is that I can still continue to do my freelance stuff and go to school. See? Win.

Except hiring me would be like using a howitzer to kill a fly. I am supremely over-qualified.

Hopefully, my carefully crafted cover letter makes it through the automated person selector. Oh, who am I kidding?

Anyway, it could be a cool night job but not as cool as this guy's night job. He has a great attitude. Puts things in perspective. Thanks for the motivation, Angel!